BCS vs. PGR
BCS (Barclays PLC) and PGR (The Progressive Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BCS in Banks - Diversified, PGR in Insurance - Property & Casualty. Over the past 10 years, BCS returned 16.72%/yr vs 24.79%/yr for PGR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCS vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 16.72%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 24.79% annualized return.
BCS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 52.37%
- 3Y*
- 57.20%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
PGR
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 0.30%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.95%
- 10Y*
- 24.79%
BCS vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 9.27% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 7.86% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 23.16% | 26.81% | 10.84% | 41.48% | 25.14% | 9.39% | 61.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCS and PGR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1986 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BCS and PGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCS:
$92.65B
PGR:
$134.82B
BCS:
£2.07
PGR:
$19.67
BCS:
9.88
PGR:
11.73
BCS:
1.79
PGR:
0.09
BCS:
2.49
PGR:
1.52
BCS:
£28.57B
PGR:
$89.43B
BCS:
£26.96B
PGR:
$25.44B
BCS:
£9.15B
PGR:
$15.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCS vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank
BCS
PGR
BCS vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCS | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.01 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | -0.07 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | -0.13 | +5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCS vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and PGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCS | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -71.06% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.20% | -19.79% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.20% | -30.35% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.14% | -30.35% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.10% | -30.35% | -35.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.74% | -15.56% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.39% | -14.54% | -23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 11.60% | -2.34% |
Volatility
BCS vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 8.36%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCS | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 8.36% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 18.00% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.68% | 23.31% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 24.78% | +9.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.35% | 24.57% | +11.78% |
Dividends
BCS vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than PGR's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.70% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 6.02% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Financials
BCS vs. PGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCS vs. PGR - Profitability Comparison
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.35B and revenue of 22.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
PGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.57B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
PGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCS and PGR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCS has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to PGR (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs PGR's -71.06%.
BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCS and PGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer