PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCS vs. PGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BCSPGR
YTD Return78.80%64.21%
1Y Return109.98%63.07%
3Y Return (Ann)13.01%40.83%
5Y Return (Ann)13.19%32.48%
10Y Return (Ann)2.42%28.69%
Sharpe Ratio3.533.08
Sortino Ratio4.064.08
Omega Ratio1.551.54
Calmar Ratio1.388.89
Martin Ratio26.1223.55
Ulcer Index4.27%2.68%
Daily Std Dev31.64%20.51%
Max Drawdown-94.39%-71.06%
Current Drawdown-59.24%-0.62%

Fundamentals


BCSPGR
Market Cap$47.31B$152.25B
EPS$1.45$13.76
PE Ratio9.0318.89
PEG Ratio1.171.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$26.37B$71.59B
Gross Profit (TTM)$19.82B$71.59B
EBITDA (TTM)-$672.00M$10.17B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BCS and PGR is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BCS vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 78.80% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's 64.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 2.42%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 28.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.94%
22.46%
BCS
PGR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCS vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCS, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCS, currently valued at 4.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BCS, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCS, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BCS, currently valued at 26.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0026.12
PGR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PGR, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PGR, currently valued at 4.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PGR, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PGR, currently valued at 8.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PGR, currently valued at 23.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0023.55

BCS vs. PGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is comparable to the PGR Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and PGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.53
3.08
BCS
PGR

Dividends

BCS vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than PGR's 0.44% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BCS
Barclays PLC
3.09%4.87%4.17%1.60%3.90%3.72%3.21%1.39%2.25%3.09%2.87%2.09%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
0.44%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%5.53%1.05%

Drawdowns

BCS vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and PGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-59.24%
-0.62%
BCS
PGR

Volatility

BCS vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 6.72%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.34%
6.72%
BCS
PGR

Financials

BCS vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items