BCE vs. XLF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BCE (BCE Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, BCE returned -1.78%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for XLF. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BCE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BCE Inc. (BCE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCE achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BCE has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of -1.78%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.

BCE

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: -14.01%
• YTD: -6.65%
• 1Y: -3.14%
• 3Y*: -14.14%
• 5Y*: -9.45%
• 10Y*: -1.78%
• ALL TIME*: 10.61%

XLF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.37%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: 19.11%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 13.69%
• ALL TIME*: 6.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCE BCE Inc.	$81.38M	$88.70M	$89.37M
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.84B	$1.93B	$1.92B

BCE vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCE BCE Inc.	-6.65%	10.25%	-35.53%	-4.16%	-10.62%	28.62%	-1.95%	23.38%	-13.02%	16.52%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	4.86%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BCE and XLF is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998	0.33

The correlation between BCE and XLF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCE vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCE

BCE Risk / Return Rank: 37
BCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BCE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BCE Martin Ratio Rank: 40

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 27
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCE	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	0.71	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	1.05	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.13	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	0.71	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	1.80	-2.07

BCE vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCE Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCE and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCE drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCE	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.67%	-82.69%	+22.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.07%	-14.79%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.49%	-15.54%	-27.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.42%	-25.81%	-29.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.42%	-42.86%	-12.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.54%	-1.15%	-49.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-19.92%	+6.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.06%	5.79%	+2.27%

Volatility

BCE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

BCE Inc. (BCE) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.07%. This indicates that BCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCE	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.48%	4.07%	+3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	11.10%	+3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	14.77%	+4.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	18.45%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	22.08%	-2.67%

Dividends

BCE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

BCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCE BCE Inc.	5.80%	6.98%	12.47%	7.29%	6.39%	5.37%	5.82%	5.16%	5.84%	4.63%	5.15%	6.00%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.42%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCE and XLF in my portfolio?

BCE and XLF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCE or XLF?

BCE has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCE dropped -60.67% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.