BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO).
Performance
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE-PB.TO BCE Inc. | 2.43% | 30.12% | -1.08% | 11.56% | -7.15% | 53.16% | -4.00% | -6.06% | -9.72% | 37.38% |
EMA-PC.TO Emera Incorporated | 1.29% | 15.47% | 23.62% | 16.61% | -18.92% | 44.17% | 3.84% | -7.46% | -8.81% | 17.30% |
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCE-PB.TO achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than EMA-PC.TO's 1.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BCE-PB.TO having a 10.18% annualized return and EMA-PC.TO not far behind at 10.16%.
BCE-PB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
EMA-PC.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCE-PB.TO
EMA-PC.TO
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCE-PB.TO | EMA-PC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 1.47 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.14 | 2.05 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.31 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.53 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 8.57 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCE-PB.TO | EMA-PC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.47 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.60 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.61 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCE-PB.TO and EMA-PC.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCE-PB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than EMA-PC.TO's 6.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE-PB.TO BCE Inc. | 5.84% | 6.14% | 10.23% | 9.43% | 5.66% | 2.96% | 4.95% | 6.42% | 5.16% | 3.58% | 4.40% | 5.05% |
EMA-PC.TO Emera Incorporated | 6.36% | 6.34% | 6.85% | 6.29% | 6.29% | 4.83% | 6.60% | 6.40% | 5.02% | 4.22% | 4.73% | 5.20% |
Drawdowns
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCE-PB.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, which is greater than EMA-PC.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE-PB.TO and EMA-PC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCE-PB.TO | EMA-PC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.96% | -45.60% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.71% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.53% | -26.10% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.96% | -45.60% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -0.51% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -9.07% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.73% | +0.52% |
Volatility
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BCE Inc. (BCE-PB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) at 1.46%. This indicates that BCE-PB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA-PC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCE-PB.TO | EMA-PC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 1.46% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.34% | 5.19% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 9.68% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 14.99% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 16.82% | -1.25% |
Financials
BCE-PB.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BCE Inc. and Emera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities