BBSA vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
BBSA and SCHZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Short-Term US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 2019. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011. Both BBSA and SCHZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSA or SCHZ.
Correlation
The correlation between BBSA and SCHZ is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
BBSA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SCHZ
2.22%
0.30%
1.31%
5.42%
-0.84%
1.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSA has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSA vs. SCHZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BBSA
SCHZ
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
BBSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSA JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.56% | 2.84% | 2.93% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.04% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.79% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
BBSA vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) is 0.00%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that BBSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.