PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

BBLL.L is traded in GBP, while TRSX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRSX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLL.L achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than TRSX.L's 1.24% return.


BBLL.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.87%
6M
3.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRSX.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
1.24%
6M
2.32%
1Y
-0.52%
3Y*
0.36%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLL.L

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLL.LTRSX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.10

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between BBLL.L and TRSX.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Dividend Comparison

BBLL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BBLL.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.07%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%

Drawdowns

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLL.L drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum TRSX.L drawdown of -26.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLL.L and TRSX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLL.LTRSX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-23.50%

+18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-10.19%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-11.07%

+9.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

Volatility

BBLL.L vs. TRSX.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBLL.LTRSX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.30%

13.41%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

16.00%

-9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

19.34%

-13.04%