PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIIX vs. BBBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BBIIX) and BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N (BBBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIIX achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BBBMX's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BBIIX has underperformed BBBMX with an annualized return of 2.41%, while BBBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.34% annualized return.


BBIIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.54%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
0.11%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
2.63%

BBBMX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.10%
6M
1.25%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
3.34%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBIIX
BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
0.11%5.45%2.43%6.09%-6.45%0.01%5.01%6.72%1.85%6.15%
BBBMX
BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N
1.62%5.54%6.81%7.44%-1.48%1.10%2.78%4.30%1.99%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIIX and BBBMX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.28

The correlation between BBIIX and BBBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIIX vs. BBBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBIIX
BBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBMX
BBBMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BBBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BBIIX) and BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N (BBBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBIIXBBBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.42

-0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

7.75

-5.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

35.29

-29.89

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the BBBMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIIX and BBBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIIX drawdown since its inception was -11.53%, which is greater than BBBMX's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIIX and BBBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIIXBBBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-6.50%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-0.57%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.47%

-0.57%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.53%

-3.18%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.53%

-6.50%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.10%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-0.57%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.13%

+0.70%

Volatility

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Volatility Comparison

BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BBIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N (BBBMX) at 0.22%. This indicates that BBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIIXBBBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.22%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

1.21%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

1.61%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

1.57%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

1.48%

+1.77%

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BBBMX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBIIX vs. BBBMX - Dividend Comparison

BBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than BBBMX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBBMX
BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N
4.10%4.60%4.80%4.23%1.78%1.29%2.03%2.93%2.57%1.99%2.00%1.72%
BBIIX
BBH Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
3.01%3.60%3.67%3.09%1.52%1.20%1.64%2.69%2.20%3.64%3.31%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIIX and BBBMX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIIX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to BBBMX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIIX dropped -11.53% vs BBBMX's -6.50%.

BBBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIIX and BBBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer