PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBD vs. NU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBD vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBD achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -23.60% return.


BBD

1D
2.08%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
5.22%
6M
9.41%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.92%

NU

1D
0.63%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-23.60%
6M
-23.04%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBD vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBD
Banco Bradesco S.A.
5.22%95.27%-41.93%35.20%-5.19%-7.38%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-23.60%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BBD and NU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.38

Over the past year, BBD and NU have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBD:

$36.27B

NU:

$62.80B

EPS

BBD:

R$2.14

NU:

$0.65

PE Ratio

BBD:

8.24

NU:

19.71

PEG Ratio

BBD:

1.35

NU:

0.30

PS Ratio

BBD:

0.51

NU:

3.58

PB Ratio

BBD:

5.43

NU:

4.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBD:

R$369.74B

NU:

$17.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBD:

R$131.29B

NU:

$7.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBD:

-R$2.27B

NU:

$4.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBD vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBD
BBD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBD vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBDNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.14

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

0.33

+2.32

BBD vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBD and NU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBD vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBD drawdown since its inception was -72.89%, roughly equal to the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBD and NU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBDNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.89%

-72.07%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.69%

-38.17%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.94%

-39.58%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.11%

-31.82%

-11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-29.78%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.70%

16.02%

-7.32%

Volatility

BBD vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) is 8.28%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that BBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBDNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

13.41%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

28.95%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.55%

38.22%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.68%

58.38%

-19.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.69%

58.38%

-15.69%

Dividends

BBD vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

BBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBD
Banco Bradesco S.A.
8.15%9.26%8.06%9.57%2.87%5.79%2.70%5.52%3.10%5.05%3.65%6.57%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BBD vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco Bradesco S.A. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
97.75B
4.98B
(BBD) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BBD values in BRL, NU values in USD

BBD vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Banco Bradesco S.A. and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.4%
40.2%
Portfolio components
BBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Bradesco S.A. reported a gross profit of 35.56B and revenue of 97.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

BBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Bradesco S.A. reported an operating income of 7.68B and revenue of 97.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

BBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Bradesco S.A. reported a net income of 5.08B and revenue of 97.75B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBD and NU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to BBD (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBD dropped -72.89% vs NU's -72.07%.

BBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBD and NU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer