BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L).

BB3M.L and JEIP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BB3M.L is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Feb 17, 2021. JEIP.L is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Oct 29, 2024.

Performance

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BB3M.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD	0.70%	4.28%	0.77%
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist	-0.02%	8.47%	-2.28%

Different Trading Currencies

BB3M.L is traded in USD, while JEIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BB3M.L achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than JEIP.L's -0.02% return.

BB3M.L

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: —

JEIP.L

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -4.34%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 3.39%
• 1Y: 8.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BB3M.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JEIP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

JEIP.L

JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist

BB3M.L

JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD

Return for Risk

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BB3M.L

BB3M.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
BB3M.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BB3M.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BB3M.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BB3M.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BB3M.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

JEIP.L

JEIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
JEIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
JEIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
JEIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
JEIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
JEIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BB3M.L	JEIP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.61	0.65	+3.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.95	0.94	+7.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.07	1.15	+0.92
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.52	0.89	+23.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	100.09	4.62	+95.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BB3M.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.61, which is higher than the JEIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BB3M.L and JEIP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BB3M.L	JEIP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.61	0.65	+3.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	3.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.37	0.36	+3.01

Correlation

The correlation between BB3M.L and JEIP.L is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Dividend Comparison

BB3M.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%.

	TTM	2025	2024
BB3M.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist	7.50%	7.18%	0.61%

Drawdowns

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BB3M.L drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum JEIP.L drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BB3M.L and JEIP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BB3M.L	JEIP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-15.73%	+14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-9.08%	+8.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-3.62%	+3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-5.40%	+5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	1.82%	-1.78%

Volatility

BB3M.L vs. JEIP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) is 0.24%, while JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that BB3M.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BB3M.L	JEIP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.24%	3.38%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.54%	6.30%	-5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84%	12.62%	-11.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.97%	11.78%	-10.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.96%	11.78%	-10.82%