BAGSX vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
BAGSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011.
Performance
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | -0.31% | 7.11% | 1.63% | 6.12% | -13.52% | -1.74% | 8.42% | 9.17% | -0.55% | 3.90% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.05% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.81%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.
BAGSX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAGSX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
BAGSX
SCHZ
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.81 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 5.21 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.03 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.44 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAGSX and SCHZ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than SCHZ's 4.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.76% | 3.69% | 3.62% | 3.10% | 2.33% | 1.68% | 3.02% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.21% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.07% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and SCHZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -18.74% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -2.51% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.84% | -18.01% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | -18.74% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -2.71% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -3.70% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.87% | +0.05% |
Volatility
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) have volatilities of 1.64% and 1.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 1.66% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 2.49% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 4.29% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 6.07% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 5.40% | -0.51% |