AVEMX vs. GSMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) and Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX).
AVEMX is managed by Ave Maria Mutual Funds. It was launched on May 1, 2001. GSMCX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 1, 1995.
Performance
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 7.40% | 2.82% | 21.43% | 3.49% | 4.19% | 25.15% | 6.20% | 20.51% | -8.70% | 17.75% |
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund | -0.51% | 9.77% | 19.33% | 11.95% | -10.25% | 30.75% | 8.78% | 32.04% | -10.53% | 11.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVEMX achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than GSMCX's -0.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AVEMX having a 11.12% annualized return and GSMCX not far behind at 10.74%.
AVEMX
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
GSMCX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVEMX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSMCX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AVEMX vs. GSMCX — Risk / Return Rank
AVEMX
GSMCX
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) and Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEMX | GSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.75 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.15 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.89 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 3.82 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEMX | GSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.75 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.53 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between AVEMX and GSMCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Dividend Comparison
AVEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than GSMCX's 14.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 0.31% | 0.34% | 8.81% | 4.42% | 1.15% | 8.07% | 3.57% | 5.27% | 10.76% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 0.12% |
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund | 14.72% | 14.65% | 13.86% | 4.92% | 13.96% | 17.06% | 0.69% | 3.42% | 18.39% | 15.77% | 1.49% | 13.85% |
Drawdowns
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVEMX drawdown since its inception was -59.76%, which is greater than GSMCX's maximum drawdown of -54.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEMX and GSMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEMX | GSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.76% | -54.35% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -13.13% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -20.03% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -42.57% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -9.17% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -7.61% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 3.06% | +2.45% |
Volatility
AVEMX vs. GSMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) is 5.17%, while Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that AVEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AVEMX | GSMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 5.54% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 10.89% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.99% | 18.89% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 17.88% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 20.45% | -1.99% |