AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L).
AUCO.L and IAUP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUCO.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2008. IAUP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Commodity Producers Gold Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. Both AUCO.L and IAUP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 12.17% | 181.83% | 17.96% | 15.02% | -14.29% | -10.15% | 21.74% | 44.15% | -10.43% | 10.00% |
IAUP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.28% | 153.95% | 11.53% | 9.39% | -11.06% | -10.31% | 23.60% | 45.64% | -9.60% | 6.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUCO.L achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly lower than IAUP.L's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L has outperformed IAUP.L with an annualized return of 19.80%, while IAUP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.39% annualized return.
AUCO.L
- 1D
- 7.53%
- 1M
- -14.77%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 117.52%
- 3Y*
- 55.66%
- 5Y*
- 28.66%
- 10Y*
- 19.80%
IAUP.L
- 1D
- 8.19%
- 1M
- -13.69%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 27.43%
- 1Y
- 112.23%
- 3Y*
- 46.64%
- 5Y*
- 25.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUCO.L and IAUP.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Return for Risk
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUCO.L
IAUP.L
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUCO.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.54 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 2.81 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.01 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 13.94 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUCO.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.54 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.73 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.11 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCO.L and IAUP.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCO.L nor IAUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, roughly equal to the maximum IAUP.L drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and IAUP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUCO.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.40% | -79.95% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.56% | -28.57% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.36% | -45.07% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.49% | -51.26% | -3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.34% | -14.59% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -49.89% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 8.22% | +0.47% |
Volatility
AUCO.L vs. IAUP.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF USD Acc (IAUP.L) have volatilities of 18.73% and 18.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUCO.L | IAUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.73% | 18.46% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.69% | 35.85% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.79% | 44.04% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.53% | 34.68% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 34.66% | +0.71% |