ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Alta Copper Corp (ATCU.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO).
Performance
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATCU.TO Alta Copper Corp | 0.72% | 228.57% | 20.00% | -37.50% | -33.33% | 31.25% | 433.33% | -50.00% | -57.14% | 40.00% |
LGD.TO Liberty Gold Corp. | 46.99% | 219.23% | -16.13% | -44.64% | -42.27% | -44.25% | 59.63% | 257.38% | -30.68% | -1.12% |
Fundamentals
ATCU.TO:
CA$130.80M
LGD.TO:
CA$627.02M
ATCU.TO:
-CA$0.01
LGD.TO:
-CA$0.05
ATCU.TO:
1.83
LGD.TO:
16.74
ATCU.TO:
CA$0.00
LGD.TO:
CA$0.00
ATCU.TO:
CA$0.00
LGD.TO:
-CA$154.10K
ATCU.TO:
-CA$1.03M
LGD.TO:
-CA$25.06M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATCU.TO achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than LGD.TO's 46.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ATCU.TO has outperformed LGD.TO with an annualized return of 14.46%, while LGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.
ATCU.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 117.19%
- 1Y
- 208.89%
- 3Y*
- 29.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
LGD.TO
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -22.29%
- YTD
- 46.99%
- 6M
- 90.63%
- 1Y
- 264.18%
- 3Y*
- 27.40%
- 5Y*
- -3.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATCU.TO
LGD.TO
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alta Copper Corp (ATCU.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATCU.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.64 | 3.80 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 3.83 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.49 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.55 | 6.28 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.45 | 20.86 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATCU.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64 | 3.80 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.05 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.13 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.04 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ATCU.TO and LGD.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATCU.TO nor LGD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATCU.TO drawdown since its inception was -145.31%, which is greater than LGD.TO's maximum drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCU.TO and LGD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATCU.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -145.31% | -99.66% | -45.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.58% | -41.21% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.12% | -87.15% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.21% | -90.04% | +5.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -106.59% | -98.17% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.36% | -75.97% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 12.41% | -3.28% |
Volatility
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alta Copper Corp (ATCU.TO) is 3.62%, while Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO) has a volatility of 23.34%. This indicates that ATCU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATCU.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 23.34% | -19.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.02% | 50.84% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.71% | 70.14% | -8.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.25% | 66.98% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.01% | 64.97% | +38.04% |
Financials
ATCU.TO vs. LGD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alta Copper Corp and Liberty Gold Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities