PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ASWC.DE
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR
3.89%38.30%39.36%14.35%
WELD.DE
Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
11.75%18.60%10.09%-2.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASWC.DE achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than WELD.DE's 11.75% return.


ASWC.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
3.89%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WELD.DE

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
11.75%
6M
15.67%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASWC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WELD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASWC.DE
ASWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

WELD.DE
WELD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WELD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASWC.DEWELD.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.72

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

2.23

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.53

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.51

10.14

-5.63

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the WELD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASWC.DE and WELD.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASWC.DEWELD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.72

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

1.11

+0.74

Correlation

The correlation between ASWC.DE and WELD.DE is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASWC.DE nor WELD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum WELD.DE drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWC.DE and WELD.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASWC.DEWELD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-14.07%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-9.74%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.16%

-2.20%

-6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.19%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

2.43%

+2.47%

Volatility

ASWC.DE vs. WELD.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE) at 5.39%. This indicates that ASWC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASWC.DEWELD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.39%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

8.98%

+6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

14.45%

+8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

13.30%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

13.30%

+5.61%