ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ASIU.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L).
ASIU.L and BNKS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASIU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. BNKS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2018. Both ASIU.L and BNKS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIU.L Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -7.59% | 36.59% | 18.62% | -16.23% | -26.27% | -23.38% | 6.66% | 4.03% | -14.84% |
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks | -2.97% | 20.45% | 28.55% | -3.74% | -18.79% | 39.71% | -12.04% | 36.28% | -24.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIU.L achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.L's -2.97% return.
ASIU.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- -7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BNKS.L
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASIU.L
BNKS.L
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ASIU.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIU.L | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.92 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.32 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.35 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 4.23 | -3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIU.L | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.92 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.19 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.17 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIU.L and BNKS.L is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASIU.L nor BNKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIU.L drawdown since its inception was -64.71%, which is greater than BNKS.L's maximum drawdown of -51.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIU.L and BNKS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIU.L | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -51.35% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -17.07% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.28% | -50.15% | -9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.70% | -11.58% | -29.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -17.98% | -18.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.29% | 5.39% | +1.90% |
Volatility
ASIU.L vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ASIU.L) is 6.82%, while iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that ASIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASIU.L | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 7.60% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 15.44% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.40% | 25.55% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 27.75% | +13.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.49% | 31.71% | +8.78% |