ARCC vs. GOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
Performance
ARCC vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARCC vs. GOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -9.97% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 11.18% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
Fundamentals
ARCC:
$12.39B
GOOD:
$545.82M
ARCC:
$1.64
GOOD:
$0.41
ARCC:
10.82
GOOD:
28.09
ARCC:
1.62
GOOD:
0.31
ARCC:
6.60
GOOD:
3.36
ARCC:
$1.88B
GOOD:
$161.34M
ARCC:
$1.18B
GOOD:
$0.00
ARCC:
$1.08B
GOOD:
$58.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCC achieves a -9.97% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCC has outperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 11.74%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.
ARCC
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -9.97%
- 6M
- -7.39%
- 1Y
- -12.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCC vs. GOOD — Risk / Return Rank
ARCC
GOOD
ARCC vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARCC | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | -0.69 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | -0.86 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.90 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.58 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.02 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCC | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | -0.69 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | -0.11 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.15 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.21 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCC and GOOD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ARCC vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.83%, more than GOOD's 10.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.83% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 10.38% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Drawdowns
ARCC vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and GOOD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCC | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -67.22% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -26.07% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -53.30% | +31.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.77% | -66.25% | +9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -35.32% | +17.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -13.30% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.40% | 14.74% | -5.34% |
Volatility
ARCC vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) have volatilities of 6.78% and 6.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARCC | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 6.85% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 16.76% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.54% | 22.42% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 24.86% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 32.11% | -6.58% |
Financials
ARCC vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Capital Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities