PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRT vs. DECW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRT vs. DECW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF (DECW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRT vs. DECW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
2.08%7.99%15.15%22.13%-2.90%
DECW
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF
-1.56%11.57%8.64%16.16%-2.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRT achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than DECW's -1.56% return.


APRT

1D
2.34%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.40%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*

DECW

1D
1.33%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
1.27%
1Y
11.55%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRT vs. DECW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APRT and DECW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

APRT vs. DECW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DECW
DECW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DECW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DECW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRT vs. DECW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF (DECW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APRTDECWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.03

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.08

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.67

10.79

+0.88

APRT vs. DECW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DECW Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APRT and DECW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRTDECWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.31

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between APRT and DECW is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

APRT vs. DECW - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRT nor DECW has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
DECW
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF
0.00%0.00%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

APRT vs. DECW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRT drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than DECW's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRT and DECW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRTDECWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-8.76%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-5.67%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.58%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-0.90%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.09%

+0.23%

Volatility

APRT vs. DECW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF (DECW) at 2.54%. This indicates that APRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRTDECWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.54%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

4.47%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

8.56%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.82%

7.22%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

7.22%

+3.18%