PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRQ vs. FJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

APRQ vs. FJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

APRQ vs. FJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FJUL

1D
1.89%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


APRQ vs. FJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

APRQ vs. FJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRQ

FJUL
FJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRQ vs. FJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (FJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

APRQ vs. FJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APRQFJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

Dividends

APRQ vs. FJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRQ nor FJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

APRQ vs. FJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FJUL drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRQ and FJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


APRQFJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.08%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.30%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.92%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

Volatility

APRQ vs. FJUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


APRQFJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.08%

-12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.91%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.68%

-10.68%