APN.L vs. MSFT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Nutrition PLC (APN.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).

Performance

APN.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Applied Nutrition PLC (APN.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APN.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APN.L Applied Nutrition PLC	-17.26%	79.23%	-2.21%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-21.83%	7.35%	3.10%

Different Trading Currencies

APN.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap APN.L : £522.10M MSFT : $2.76T
PB Ratio APN.L : 7.50 MSFT : 7.06

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APN.L achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -24.12% return.

APN.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: -17.26%
• 6M: 26.52%
• 1Y: 78.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.72%
• YTD: -24.12%
• 6M: -29.15%
• 1Y: -5.77%
• 3Y*: 5.97%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 22.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APN.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APN.L

APN.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
APN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
APN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
APN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
APN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
APN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 38
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APN.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Nutrition PLC (APN.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APN.L	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	-0.22	+2.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	-0.13	+3.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	0.98	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	-0.19	+4.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	-0.49	+14.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APN.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APN.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APN.L and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APN.L	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	-0.22	+2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.68	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between APN.L and MSFT is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

APN.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

APN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APN.L Applied Nutrition PLC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.94%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Drawdowns

APN.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APN.L drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APN.L and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	APN.L	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.62%	-69.38%	+38.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.15%	-33.91%	+12.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.81%	-31.43%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-21.77%	+12.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.88%	12.46%	-6.58%

Volatility

APN.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Applied Nutrition PLC (APN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 4.89%. This indicates that APN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APN.L	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	4.89%	+6.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.80%	18.58%	+6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.25%	26.74%	+5.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.12%	25.36%	+4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.12%	27.12%	+3.00%

Financials

APN.L vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Nutrition PLC and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

APN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Nutrition PLC reported a gross profit of 34.00M and revenue of 74.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.30B and revenue of 81.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

APN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Nutrition PLC reported an operating income of 20.70M and revenue of 74.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.28B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.

APN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Nutrition PLC reported a net income of 15.40M and revenue of 74.50M, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 38.46B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in a net margin of 47.3%.