ANTO.L vs. TECK
Compare and contrast key facts about Antofagasta plc (ANTO.L) and Teck Resources Limited (TECK).
Performance
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANTO.L Antofagasta plc | 6.19% | 108.87% | -4.41% | 11.47% | 21.60% | -4.98% | 59.60% | 20.79% | -19.88% | 51.39% |
TECK Teck Resources Limited | 13.08% | 10.71% | -0.88% | 8.27% | 49.73% | 61.35% | 2.77% | -21.82% | -11.95% | 22.61% |
Different Trading Currencies
ANTO.L is traded in GBp, while TECK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TECK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
ANTO.L:
£34.33B
TECK:
$26.05B
ANTO.L:
£1.93
TECK:
$2.85
ANTO.L:
18.05
TECK:
18.69
ANTO.L:
2.06
TECK:
0.45
ANTO.L:
2.57
TECK:
2.43
ANTO.L:
3.31
TECK:
1.04
ANTO.L:
£13.36B
TECK:
$10.75B
ANTO.L:
£5.92B
TECK:
$2.58B
ANTO.L:
£7.12B
TECK:
$3.90B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANTO.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than TECK's 13.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ANTO.L has outperformed TECK with an annualized return of 25.29%, while TECK has yielded a comparatively lower 23.73% annualized return.
ANTO.L
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- -16.26%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 108.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 25.29%
TECK
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 13.08%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 42.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 24.94%
- 10Y*
- 23.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANTO.L vs. TECK — Risk / Return Rank
ANTO.L
TECK
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antofagasta plc (ANTO.L) and Teck Resources Limited (TECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANTO.L | TECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 0.89 | +1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 1.51 | +1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 1.75 | +1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 4.30 | +10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANTO.L | TECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 0.89 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.10 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANTO.L and TECK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Dividend Comparison
ANTO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than TECK's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANTO.L Antofagasta plc | 0.64% | 0.68% | 1.28% | 2.37% | 5.15% | 2.80% | 0.95% | 3.16% | 3.25% | 1.50% | 0.26% | 1.18% |
TECK Teck Resources Limited | 0.69% | 0.75% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 0.56% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 1.11% | 2.29% | 0.50% | 5.18% |
Drawdowns
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANTO.L drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than TECK's maximum drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANTO.L and TECK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANTO.L | TECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -95.19% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.45% | -26.03% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.62% | -46.10% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.62% | -79.58% | +33.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.23% | -13.28% | -72.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.60% | -39.04% | -55.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 10.60% | -3.11% |
Volatility
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Volatility Comparison
Antofagasta plc (ANTO.L) has a higher volatility of 18.86% compared to Teck Resources Limited (TECK) at 15.20%. This indicates that ANTO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANTO.L | TECK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.86% | 15.20% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.95% | 30.93% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.08% | 47.62% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.80% | 43.36% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.46% | 48.74% | -10.28% |
Financials
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antofagasta plc and Teck Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANTO.L vs. TECK - Profitability Comparison
ANTO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antofagasta plc reported a gross profit of 2.56B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
TECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teck Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 914.25M and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.9%.
ANTO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antofagasta plc reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.0%.
TECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teck Resources Limited reported an operating income of 650.47M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
ANTO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antofagasta plc reported a net income of 811.18M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.
TECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teck Resources Limited reported a net income of 543.56M and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.