PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANNX vs. CRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANNX vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANNX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 19.13% return.


ANNX

1D
-2.93%
1M
19.53%
6M
1.26%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
118.22%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
-24.17%
10Y*

CRT

1D
0.49%
1M
-13.85%
6M
15.36%
YTD
19.13%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
-16.29%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANNX vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ANNX
Annexon, Inc.
12.15%-2.14%13.00%-12.19%-55.00%-54.10%43.85%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
19.13%-13.15%-39.15%-24.36%145.90%53.31%30.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ANNX and CRT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2020

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANNX:

$673.32M

CRT:

$55.50M

EPS

ANNX:

-$1.18

CRT:

$0.54

PB Ratio

ANNX:

5.35

CRT:

26.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANNX:

$0.00

CRT:

$4.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANNX:

-$1.90M

CRT:

$4.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

ANNX:

-$199.90M

CRT:

$3.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANNX vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANNX
ANNX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ANNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
CRT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANNX vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANNXCRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.04

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

0.04

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

0.09

+7.29

ANNX vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANNX and CRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANNX vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANNX drawdown since its inception was -96.06%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANNX and CRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANNXCRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.06%

-83.57%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.06%

-27.18%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.33%

-63.52%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.08%

-71.10%

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.92%

-60.22%

-23.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.19%

-29.48%

-43.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.06%

12.85%

+3.21%

Volatility

ANNX vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

Annexon, Inc. (ANNX) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 11.48%. This indicates that ANNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANNXCRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.89%

11.48%

+8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.64%

21.59%

+27.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.59%

32.16%

+45.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.84%

50.40%

+39.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.33%

46.06%

+41.27%

Dividends

ANNX vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

ANNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNX
Annexon, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
5.73%9.41%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.45%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%

Financials

ANNX vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Annexon, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
787.85K
(ANNX) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ANNX and CRT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANNX has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to CRT (11.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANNX dropped -96.06% vs CRT's -83.57%.

ANNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANNX and CRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer