AMZW vs. COSW
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW).
AMZW and COSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMZW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025.
Performance
AMZW vs. COSW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMZW vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | -12.52% | 4.13% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 17.20% | -10.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -12.52% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 17.20% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -12.52%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 17.20%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMZW vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZW and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.44 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and COSW is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AMZW vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.30%, more than COSW's 12.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 41.30% | 25.29% |
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.26% | 4.96% |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and COSW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -12.17% | -14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.69% | -3.28% | -19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -4.05% | -5.56% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | COSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.58% | 25.36% | +12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.58% | 25.36% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.58% | 25.36% | +12.22% |