PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
-18.71%-2.75%23.09%
GOOO.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP
-8.29%35.20%25.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD.L achieves a -18.71% return, which is significantly lower than GOOO.L's -8.29% return.


AMZD.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.20%
YTD
-18.71%
6M
-15.26%
1Y
-9.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOO.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
-8.29%
6M
9.54%
1Y
50.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZD.L and GOOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZD.L
AMZD.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOO.L
GOOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZD.LGOOO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

1.93

-2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.22

2.68

-2.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.32

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

3.13

-3.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

10.51

-11.26

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD.L and GOOO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZD.LGOOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

1.93

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

1.31

-1.37

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD.L and GOOO.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison

AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.75%, less than GOOO.L's 14.98% yield.


Drawdowns

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.73%, which is greater than GOOO.L's maximum drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD.L and GOOO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZD.LGOOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.73%

-28.28%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.42%

-16.31%

-12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.53%

-13.96%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.84%

-8.21%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.73%

4.86%

+6.87%

Volatility

AMZD.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) at 6.04%. This indicates that AMZD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZD.LGOOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

6.04%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

16.08%

+5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

25.95%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

25.62%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

25.62%

+2.68%