PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
-18.28%-2.75%23.09%
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
4.64%49.56%3.13%
Different Trading Currencies

AMZD.L is traded in GBp, while GLDI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD.L achieves a -18.28% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI.L's 4.64% return.


AMZD.L

1D
1.34%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-18.28%
6M
-16.42%
1Y
-6.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDI.L

1D
2.31%
1M
-8.13%
YTD
4.64%
6M
15.20%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZD.L
AMZD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDI.L
GLDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZD.LGLDI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

1.62

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

2.00

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.32

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.06

-2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.73

8.79

-9.52

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD.L and GLDI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZD.LGLDI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

1.62

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

2.03

-2.08

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD.L and GLDI.L is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Dividend Comparison

AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than GLDI.L's 11.85% yield.


TTM20252024
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
15.44%14.03%2.37%
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
11.85%9.15%1.08%

Drawdowns

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.73%, which is greater than GLDI.L's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD.L and GLDI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZD.LGLDI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.73%

-16.47%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.42%

-16.47%

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.14%

-12.11%

-15.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-2.52%

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.78%

4.21%

+7.57%

Volatility

AMZD.L vs. GLDI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) is 7.87%, while IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) has a volatility of 11.48%. This indicates that AMZD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZD.LGLDI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

11.48%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.96%

19.09%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.84%

21.43%

+8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.33%

18.39%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.33%

18.39%

+9.94%