AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Azucar Minerals Ltd (AMZ.V) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO).

Performance

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Azucar Minerals Ltd (AMZ.V) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMZ.V Azucar Minerals Ltd	45.45%	120.00%	-50.00%	-9.09%	-31.25%	-48.39%	-11.43%	-53.95%	-69.84%	-30.77%
LGD.TO Liberty Gold Corp.	40.96%	219.23%	-16.13%	-44.64%	-42.27%	-44.25%	59.63%	257.38%	-30.68%	-1.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMZ.V : CA$5.91M LGD.TO : CA$601.32M
EPS AMZ.V : -CA$0.01 LGD.TO : -CA$0.05
PB Ratio AMZ.V : 4.24 LGD.TO : 16.05
Total Revenue (TTM) AMZ.V : CA$0.00 LGD.TO : CA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) AMZ.V : -CA$3.63K LGD.TO : -CA$154.10K

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZ.V achieves a 45.45% return, which is significantly higher than LGD.TO's 40.96% return.

AMZ.V

• 1D: -30.43%
• 1M: 23.08%
• YTD: 45.45%
• 6M: 33.33%
• 1Y: 166.67%
• 3Y*: -7.17%
• 5Y*: -8.54%
• 10Y*: —

LGD.TO

• 1D: 8.33%
• 1M: -25.95%
• YTD: 40.96%
• 6M: 85.71%
• 1Y: 244.12%
• 3Y*: 25.64%
• 5Y*: -4.07%
• 10Y*: 8.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZ.V

AMZ.V Risk / Return Rank: 83
AMZ.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AMZ.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMZ.V Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AMZ.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
AMZ.V Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LGD.TO

LGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
LGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azucar Minerals Ltd (AMZ.V) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZ.V	LGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	3.51	-2.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.68	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	6.05	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	20.24	-12.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZ.V Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the LGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZ.V and LGD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZ.V	LGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	3.51	-2.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	-0.06	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.03	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between AMZ.V and LGD.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZ.V nor LGD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZ.V drawdown since its inception was -98.91%, roughly equal to the maximum LGD.TO drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZ.V and LGD.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZ.V	LGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.91%	-99.66%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.00%	-41.21%	-13.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.47%	-87.15%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-90.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.63%	-98.25%	+2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-79.90%	-75.96%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.87%	12.32%	+16.55%

Volatility

AMZ.V vs. LGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Azucar Minerals Ltd (AMZ.V) has a higher volatility of 80.11% compared to Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO) at 23.20%. This indicates that AMZ.V's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZ.V	LGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	80.11%	23.20%	+56.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.01%	50.75%	+76.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	173.44%	70.05%	+103.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	141.04%	66.95%	+74.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	122.42%	64.97%	+57.45%

Financials