PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMSSY vs. PYPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ams AG (AMSSY) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMSSY achieves a 161.21% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -23.49% return.


AMSSY

1D
5.93%
1M
82.07%
YTD
161.21%
6M
218.29%
1Y
182.11%
3Y*
69.27%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*

PYPL

1D
-1.46%
1M
-11.72%
YTD
-23.49%
6M
-28.99%
1Y
-36.88%
3Y*
-11.21%
5Y*
-29.54%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMSSY
ams AG
161.21%46.15%186.53%-58.66%-59.56%-13.11%-47.53%67.95%-73.14%-0.95%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-23.49%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-19.48%116.51%28.64%14.22%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AMSSY and PYPL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMSSY:

$2.65B

PYPL:

$40.97B

EPS

AMSSY:

-$0.82

PYPL:

$5.31

PS Ratio

AMSSY:

1.01

PYPL:

1.26

PB Ratio

AMSSY:

3.19

PYPL:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMSSY:

$3.31B

PYPL:

$33.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMSSY:

$828.04M

PYPL:

$15.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMSSY:

$523.39M

PYPL:

$7.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ams AG

PayPal Holdings, Inc.

Return for Risk

AMSSY vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMSSY
AMSSY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AMSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ams AG (AMSSY) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMSSYPYPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

-0.95

+3.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

-1.18

+4.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.83

+0.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

-0.73

+4.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.74

-1.33

+9.07

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMSSY Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMSSY and PYPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMSSYPYPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

-0.95

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.71

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.02

-0.07

Drawdowns

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMSSY drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than PYPL's maximum drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSSY and PYPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSSYPYPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.16%

-87.30%

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.28%

-49.92%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.15%

-57.34%

-30.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.03%

-87.30%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.52%

-85.49%

+11.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.27%

-35.61%

-44.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.52%

27.38%

-3.86%

Volatility

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

ams AG (AMSSY) has a higher volatility of 33.25% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 8.86%. This indicates that AMSSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSSYPYPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.25%

8.86%

+24.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.58%

31.36%

+36.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.30%

38.82%

+43.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

286.28%

42.04%

+244.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

227.21%

38.75%

+188.46%

Dividends

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

AMSSY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMSSY
ams AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%34.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.63%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ams AG and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
809.09M
8.35B
(AMSSY) Total Revenue
(PYPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMSSY vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ams AG and PayPal Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
23.2%
45.6%
Portfolio components
AMSSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ams AG reported a gross profit of 188.04M and revenue of 809.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

PYPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

AMSSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ams AG reported an operating income of -37.61M and revenue of 809.09M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.

PYPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

AMSSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ams AG reported a net income of -156.53M and revenue of 809.09M, resulting in a net margin of -19.4%.

PYPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMSSY and PYPL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSSY has higher volatility (33.25%) compared to PYPL (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSSY dropped -99.16% vs PYPL's -87.30%.

AMSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMSSY and PYPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer