AMR vs. CEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and CONSOL Energy Inc. (CEIX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMR or CEIX.
Correlation
The correlation between AMR and CEIX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
AMR vs. CEIX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Fundamentals
AMR:
$1.43B
CEIX:
$2.93B
AMR:
$14.28
CEIX:
$13.54
AMR:
7.67
CEIX:
7.36
AMR:
$2.09B
CEIX:
$1.05B
AMR:
$139.36M
CEIX:
$269.35M
AMR:
$222.88M
CEIX:
$298.09M
Returns By Period
AMR
-45.26%
-17.51%
-53.97%
-64.80%
100.73%
N/A
CEIX
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMR vs. CEIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AMR
CEIX
AMR vs. CEIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and CONSOL Energy Inc. (CEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMR vs. CEIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMR nor CEIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.15% |
CEIX CONSOL Energy Inc. | 0.59% | 0.47% | 2.19% | 3.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMR vs. CEIX - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
AMR vs. CEIX - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a higher volatility of 16.21% compared to CONSOL Energy Inc. (CEIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMR vs. CEIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and CONSOL Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with AMR or CEIX
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
How is Sharpe ratio calculated?
The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???
Addendum:
Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!
Bob Peticolas
Start and end date for portfolio performance & analysis
Hi All
This is an amazing tool! The only feature that I can't see is the option to add a start and end date (month or year) for portfolio calculations (for example: from December 2024 to January 2025). Is that something I'm missing?
Thanks,
John
John Harrison