PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMH vs. INVH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMH vs. INVH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMH achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than INVH's 5.15% return.


AMH

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.10%
6M
2.92%
1Y
-11.98%
3Y*
0.31%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
7.65%

INVH

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.19%
YTD
5.15%
6M
5.90%
1Y
-10.58%
3Y*
-2.32%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMH vs. INVH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMH
American Homes 4 Rent
1.10%-11.12%6.99%22.44%-29.46%46.91%15.28%33.13%-8.23%-0.94%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
5.15%-9.68%-3.13%19.71%-33.04%55.58%1.19%52.27%-13.10%19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AMH and INVH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.81

The correlation between AMH and INVH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

AMH:

$1.26

INVH:

$0.96

PE Ratio

AMH:

25.36

INVH:

30.11

PEG Ratio

AMH:

0.79

INVH:

1.31

PS Ratio

AMH:

8.49

INVH:

6.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMH:

$1.40B

INVH:

$2.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMH:

$547.38M

INVH:

$1.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMH:

$1.03B

INVH:

$1.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMH vs. INVH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMH
AMH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

INVH
INVH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
INVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMH vs. INVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMHINVHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.62

-0.52

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.77

-0.61

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.93

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.41

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-0.70

-0.19

AMH vs. INVH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMH Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is comparable to the INVH Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMH and INVH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMHINVHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

-0.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.07

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.26

+0.07

Drawdowns

AMH vs. INVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMH drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, smaller than the maximum INVH drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMH and INVH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMHINVHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.40%

-50.54%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.79%

-26.13%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

-30.87%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

-38.44%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.66%

-26.25%

+8.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-13.34%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.51%

15.33%

-1.82%

Volatility

AMH vs. INVH - Volatility Comparison

American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) at 4.82%. This indicates that AMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMHINVHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

4.82%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

16.29%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

20.55%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.32%

23.19%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

25.52%

-1.92%

Dividends

AMH vs. INVH - Dividend Comparison

AMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than INVH's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMH
American Homes 4 Rent
3.83%3.74%2.78%2.45%2.39%0.92%0.67%0.76%1.01%0.92%0.95%1.20%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
4.09%4.21%3.53%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AMH vs. INVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M202220232024202520260
685.25M
(AMH) Total Revenue
(INVH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMH and INVH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMH has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to INVH (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMH dropped -38.40% vs INVH's -50.54%.

INVH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMH and INVH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer