PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMD3.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities
-34.93%65.21%-76.77%480.09%-97.55%358.41%
LQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
-19.65%27.94%59.80%207.47%-79.55%67.19%
Different Trading Currencies

AMD3.L is traded in USD, while LQQ3.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LQQ3.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMD3.L achieves a -34.93% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ3.L's -19.65% return.


AMD3.L

1D
20.77%
1M
16.62%
YTD
-34.93%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
126.43%
3Y*
-19.37%
5Y*
10Y*

LQQ3.L

1D
9.51%
1M
-11.20%
YTD
-19.65%
6M
-16.83%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
45.96%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMD3.L and LQQ3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMD3.L
AMD3.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LQQ3.L
LQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMD3.LLQQ3.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.78

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.39

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.19

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.02

3.85

-0.83

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMD3.L and LQQ3.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMD3.LLQQ3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.78

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.52

-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between AMD3.L and LQQ3.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMD3.L nor LQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMD3.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, which is greater than LQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMD3.L and LQQ3.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMD3.LLQQ3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-79.16%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.17%

-35.64%

-40.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.53%

-28.72%

-68.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.37%

-23.66%

-59.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.17%

11.66%

+28.51%

Volatility

AMD3.L vs. LQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) has a higher volatility of 41.74% compared to WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) at 17.26%. This indicates that AMD3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMD3.LLQQ3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.74%

17.26%

+24.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

141.44%

35.25%

+106.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

176.26%

58.24%

+118.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

153.13%

61.42%

+91.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

153.13%

61.15%

+91.98%