PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
4.61%113.79%29.88%
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
-8.12%22.14%20.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX.TO achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than HYLD.TO's -8.12% return.


AMAX.TO

1D
5.62%
1M
-18.54%
YTD
4.61%
6M
13.47%
1Y
68.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYLD.TO

1D
2.59%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
-4.52%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD.TO's 2.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX.TO
AMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD.TO
HYLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAX.TOHYLD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

0.85

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

1.34

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.36

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.13

5.82

+3.32

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the HYLD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX.TO and HYLD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAX.TOHYLD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.85

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

0.40

+1.56

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX.TO and HYLD.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Dividend Comparison

AMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than HYLD.TO's 12.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
6.91%7.11%11.22%0.00%0.00%
HYLD.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF
12.36%11.98%12.13%12.11%13.02%

Drawdowns

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum HYLD.TO drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX.TO and HYLD.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAX.TOHYLD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-31.38%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.60%

-14.02%

-14.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.54%

-9.77%

-8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-9.24%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

3.28%

+4.46%

Volatility

AMAX.TO vs. HYLD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) at 7.05%. This indicates that AMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMAX.TOHYLD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.54%

7.05%

+9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.06%

12.24%

+20.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.73%

21.72%

+18.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.11%

19.29%

+13.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.11%

19.29%

+13.82%