PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 53.01% return, which is significantly higher than GOOGL's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AKAM has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 9.75%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.76% annualized return.


AKAM

1D
0.79%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
53.01%
6M
55.45%
1Y
70.04%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
9.75%

GOOGL

1D
0.53%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
15.06%
6M
16.44%
1Y
105.30%
3Y*
43.10%
5Y*
24.46%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
53.01%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
15.06%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and GOOGL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2004

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between AKAM and GOOGL has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKAM:

$20.03B

GOOGL:

$4.40T

EPS

AKAM:

$2.95

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

AKAM:

45.19

GOOGL:

27.43

PS Ratio

AKAM:

4.61

GOOGL:

10.40

PB Ratio

AKAM:

4.08

GOOGL:

9.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKAM:

$4.27B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKAM:

$2.44B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

AKAM:

$1.14B

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AKAMGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.59

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.20

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

18.48

-9.39

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-65.29%

-34.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-20.37%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-29.81%

-17.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-44.32%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-44.32%

-2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.25%

-10.61%

-48.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.59%

-13.01%

-69.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

5.72%

+2.01%

Volatility

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a higher volatility of 15.13% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 7.24%. This indicates that AKAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

7.24%

+7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.95%

20.82%

+27.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.31%

29.31%

+25.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.61%

31.33%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.47%

29.13%

+5.34%

Dividends

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM20252024
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%

Financials

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
1.07B
109.90B
(AKAM) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AKAM vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%64.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
62.5%
Portfolio components
AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to GOOGL (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer