PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.L vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
2.99%34.74%0.43%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
2.84%-3.18%2.16%
Different Trading Currencies

AINF.L is traded in GBP, while SGOV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGOV values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 2.84% return.


AINF.L

1D
-24.62%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
2.99%
6M
9.15%
1Y
68.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.68%
1M
1.45%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.84%
1Y
3.14%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AINF.L vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

AINF.L vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.LSGOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.32

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

0.51

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.06

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

0.27

+2.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.66

0.50

+18.16

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.L and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.LSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.32

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.20

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.L and SGOV is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
AINF.L
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.95%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Drawdowns

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and SGOV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.LSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-0.03%

-28.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.62%

-0.01%

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.62%

0.00%

-24.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

0.00%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

0.00%

+3.65%

Volatility

AINF.L vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 44.41% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 2.72%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AINF.LSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.41%

2.72%

+41.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.21%

4.92%

+41.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.90%

7.38%

+44.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.25%

8.58%

+38.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.25%

8.57%

+38.68%