AINF.L vs. KROP.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE).
AINF.L and KROP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AINF.L is managed by iShares. KROP.DE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022.
Performance
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 3.20% | 34.74% | 0.43% |
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.93% | 0.08% | -5.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
AINF.L is traded in GBP, while KROP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the KROP.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 15.93% return.
AINF.L
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 57.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- -7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AINF.L
KROP.DE
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINF.L | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 0.75 | +1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 1.16 | +1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.14 | 1.76 | +3.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.97 | 3.67 | +13.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINF.L | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 0.75 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | -0.46 | +1.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between AINF.L and KROP.DE is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AINF.L nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum KROP.DE drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and KROP.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINF.L | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -52.74% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -11.51% | -2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -41.86% | +38.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -36.24% | +30.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 5.47% | -2.10% |
Volatility
AINF.L vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) at 5.81%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AINF.L | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 5.81% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 11.74% | +5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.67% | 17.41% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 19.50% | +6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 19.50% | +6.49% |