AIFRX vs. PGJZX
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX).
AIFRX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 2, 2008. PGJZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 24, 2013.
Performance
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 11.13% | 26.92% | 2.88% | 13.10% | -7.95% | 15.61% | 1.87% | 28.41% | -9.31% | 25.24% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.87% | 18.41% | 17.13% | 5.85% | -7.82% | 15.06% | 1.98% | 28.89% | -8.57% | 18.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIFRX achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than PGJZX's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has outperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.
AIFRX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
PGJZX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIFRX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank
AIFRX
PGJZX
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIFRX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 1.92 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.47 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.38 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.11 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.01 | 12.57 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIFRX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.92 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.61 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIFRX and PGJZX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison
AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than PGJZX's 6.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIFRX abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund | 7.07% | 7.80% | 8.13% | 3.46% | 4.86% | 5.31% | 3.45% | 4.01% | 3.96% | 3.80% | 4.37% | 4.55% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.60% | 7.18% | 9.95% | 1.59% | 3.30% | 7.77% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PGJZX drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and PGJZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIFRX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -36.64% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -7.74% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -20.56% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.38% | -36.64% | -1.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -4.13% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -5.66% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.91% | -0.08% |
Volatility
AIFRX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIFRX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.65% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 7.49% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 12.49% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 14.22% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 15.73% | +0.14% |