PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AFL vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AFLXLF
YTD Return-1.89%5.69%
1Y Return23.70%21.15%
3Y Return (Ann)17.45%5.78%
5Y Return (Ann)13.23%9.93%
10Y Return (Ann)12.53%12.94%
Sharpe Ratio1.201.74
Daily Std Dev20.25%12.99%
Max Drawdown-82.71%-82.43%
Current Drawdown-6.32%-6.01%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AFL and XLF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AFL vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 5.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AFL having a 12.53% annualized return and XLF not far ahead at 12.94%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.05%
18.43%
AFL
XLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aflac Incorporated

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFL vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AFL, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AFL, currently valued at 6.72, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.72
XLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 6.73, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.73

AFL vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AFL and XLF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.20
1.74
AFL
XLF

Dividends

AFL vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than XLF's 1.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.19%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%2.13%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.62%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%1.81%

Drawdowns

AFL vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-6.32%
-6.01%
AFL
XLF

Volatility

AFL vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 3.85%. This indicates that AFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.40%
3.85%
AFL
XLF