PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AFL vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFL vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.95%
22.22%
AFL
XLF

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 38.35% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 34.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 16.80%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


AFL

YTD

38.35%

1M

0.07%

6M

29.95%

1Y

38.47%

5Y (annualized)

18.56%

10Y (annualized)

16.80%

XLF

YTD

34.95%

1M

6.41%

6M

22.22%

1Y

44.58%

5Y (annualized)

13.14%

10Y (annualized)

11.90%

Key characteristics


AFLXLF
Sharpe Ratio1.953.27
Sortino Ratio2.364.61
Omega Ratio1.401.59
Calmar Ratio3.543.79
Martin Ratio11.6223.39
Ulcer Index3.39%1.93%
Daily Std Dev20.22%13.82%
Max Drawdown-82.71%-82.69%
Current Drawdown-2.62%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AFL and XLF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFL vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.953.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for AFL, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.364.61
The chart of Omega ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.401.59
The chart of Calmar ratio for AFL, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.543.79
The chart of Martin ratio for AFL, currently valued at 11.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.6223.39
AFL
XLF

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
3.27
AFL
XLF

Dividends

AFL vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than XLF's 1.33% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
1.79%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%2.13%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.33%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%1.95%1.61%1.47%

Drawdowns

AFL vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.62%
0
AFL
XLF

Volatility

AFL vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have volatilities of 7.16% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.16%
7.09%
AFL
XLF