AFCG vs. VNQ
AFCG (AFC Gamma, Inc.) is a stock, while VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) is REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Over the past 5 years, AFCG returned -16.91%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for VNQ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFCG vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 25.18% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 7.83% return.
AFCG
- 1D
- -6.17%
- 1M
- 19.45%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 6M
- 20.53%
- 1Y
- -28.14%
- 3Y*
- -13.95%
- 5Y*
- -16.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
AFCG vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 25.18% | -61.90% | 18.70% | -10.49% | -21.23% | 4.83% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 7.83% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 31.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFCG and VNQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021 | 0.34 |
The correlation between AFCG and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFCG vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
AFCG
VNQ
AFCG vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFCG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 0.76 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 1.12 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.14 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.20 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 3.78 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFCG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.76 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.12 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.26 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
AFCG vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, which is greater than VNQ's maximum drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFCG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -73.07% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.78% | -8.34% | -52.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.86% | -17.46% | -59.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.25% | -34.48% | -43.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -3.75% | -59.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.96% | -13.63% | -19.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.24% | 2.64% | +36.60% |
Volatility
AFCG vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) has a higher volatility of 21.18% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 3.72%. This indicates that AFCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFCG | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.18% | 3.72% | +17.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.69% | 9.26% | +37.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.93% | 13.16% | +51.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.63% | 18.80% | +23.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.76% | 20.70% | +22.06% |
Dividends
AFCG vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than VNQ's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 10.00% | 18.60% | 17.04% | 16.63% | 14.18% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.69% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFCG and VNQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFCG has higher volatility (21.18%) compared to VNQ (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFCG dropped -78.25% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFCG and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer