PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFCG vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFCG vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 11.98% return.


AFCG

1D
0.63%
1M
-12.91%
YTD
13.38%
6M
10.66%
1Y
-26.48%
3Y*
-19.56%
5Y*
-15.89%
10Y*

VNQ

1D
0.19%
1M
0.85%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.64%
1Y
14.26%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFCG vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AFCG
AFC Gamma, Inc.
13.38%-61.90%18.70%-10.49%-21.23%14.82%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
11.98%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AFCG and VNQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021

0.33

The correlation between AFCG and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFCG vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFCG
AFCG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
AFCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFCG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AFCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFCG vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFCGVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.19

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

1.72

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

5.42

-6.18

AFCG vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFCG and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFCG vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, which is greater than VNQ's maximum drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFCGVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.25%

-73.07%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.88%

-8.34%

-48.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.86%

-17.46%

-59.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.25%

-34.48%

-43.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.37%

-0.47%

-65.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-13.59%

-19.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.66%

2.64%

+32.02%

Volatility

AFCG vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 5.18%. This indicates that AFCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFCGVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

5.18%

+6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.78%

10.18%

+32.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.74%

13.76%

+47.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.60%

18.86%

+23.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.88%

20.74%

+22.14%

Dividends

AFCG vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than VNQ's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFCG
AFC Gamma, Inc.
11.04%18.60%17.04%16.63%14.18%5.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
4.47%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFCG and VNQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFCG has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to VNQ (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFCG dropped -78.25% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFCG and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer