AFCG vs. ARCC
Compare and contrast key facts about AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
Performance
AFCG vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFCG vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 0.86% | -61.90% | 18.70% | -10.49% | -21.23% | 4.83% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -8.49% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 23.30% |
Fundamentals
AFCG:
$64.12M
ARCC:
$12.60B
AFCG:
-$0.93
ARCC:
$1.64
AFCG:
29.89
ARCC:
6.71
AFCG:
0.37
ARCC:
0.88
AFCG:
$2.11M
ARCC:
$1.88B
AFCG:
$1.39M
ARCC:
$1.18B
AFCG:
-$3.08M
ARCC:
$1.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -8.49% return.
AFCG
- 1D
- 8.88%
- 1M
- 26.07%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- -24.95%
- 1Y
- -44.70%
- 3Y*
- -20.37%
- 5Y*
- -18.17%
- 10Y*
- —
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- -8.49%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- 1Y
- -10.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFCG vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
AFCG
ARCC
AFCG vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | -0.46 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | -0.51 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.54 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.12 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.46 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.44 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.37 | -0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFCG and ARCC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AFCG vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, more than ARCC's 10.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 12.41% | 18.60% | 17.04% | 16.63% | 14.18% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.65% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
AFCG vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and ARCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -79.36% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.58% | -19.35% | -42.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.25% | -21.76% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.09% | -16.71% | -53.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.76% | -9.07% | -22.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.40% | 9.33% | +27.07% |
Volatility
AFCG vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) has a higher volatility of 20.11% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 6.61%. This indicates that AFCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.11% | 6.61% | +13.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.20% | 15.16% | +29.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.94% | 23.48% | +41.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.91% | 19.88% | +22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.92% | 25.53% | +16.39% |
Financials
AFCG vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AFC Gamma, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFCG vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
AFCG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.92M and revenue of 6.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 43.48M and revenue of 202.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.
AFCG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.72M and revenue of 6.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 26.85M and revenue of 202.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
AFCG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a net income of 914.05K and revenue of 6.64M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 142.36M and revenue of 202.00M, resulting in a net margin of 70.5%.