AFCG vs. ARCC
AFCG (AFC Gamma, Inc.) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. AFCG operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while ARCC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, AFCG returned -15.89%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFCG vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFCG achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -6.31% return.
AFCG
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -12.91%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- -26.48%
- 3Y*
- -19.56%
- 5Y*
- -15.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ARCC
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -6.31%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- -8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
AFCG vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 13.38% | -61.90% | 18.70% | -10.49% | -21.23% | 14.82% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -6.31% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 24.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFCG and ARCC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
AFCG:
$74.59M
ARCC:
$12.92B
AFCG:
-$0.88
ARCC:
$1.63
AFCG:
12.03
ARCC:
4.82
AFCG:
0.40
ARCC:
0.92
AFCG:
$5.96M
ARCC:
$2.63B
AFCG:
-$4.57M
ARCC:
$1.86B
AFCG:
-$4.14M
ARCC:
$2.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFCG vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
AFCG
ARCC
AFCG vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.42 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -0.73 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFCG vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFCG drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFCG and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -79.36% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.88% | -19.35% | -37.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.86% | -19.35% | -57.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.25% | -21.76% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.37% | -14.72% | -51.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -9.11% | -24.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.66% | 10.97% | +23.69% |
Volatility
AFCG vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
AFC Gamma, Inc. (AFCG) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.47%. This indicates that AFCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFCG | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 4.47% | +6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.78% | 15.10% | +27.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.74% | 18.66% | +43.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 19.95% | +22.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.88% | 25.59% | +17.29% |
Dividends
AFCG vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
AFCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than ARCC's 10.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFCG AFC Gamma, Inc. | 11.04% | 18.60% | 17.04% | 16.63% | 14.18% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.67% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
Financials
AFCG vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AFC Gamma, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFCG vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
AFCG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 9.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
AFCG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.94M and revenue of 9.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
AFCG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AFC Gamma, Inc. reported a net income of 4.83M and revenue of 9.81M, resulting in a net margin of 49.2%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AFCG and ARCC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFCG has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to ARCC (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFCG dropped -78.25% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
AFCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFCG and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer