ADM vs. ED
Compare and contrast key facts about Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADM or ED.
Key characteristics
| ADM | ED | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -12.64% | 2.89% |
| 1Y Return | -20.25% | -2.95% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.05% | 10.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.84% | 5.75% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.35% | 8.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.62 | -0.15 |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.33% | 17.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.01% | -74.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.91% | -4.27% |
Fundamentals
| ADM | ED | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $31.41B | $31.73B |
| EPS | $6.43 | $7.21 |
| PE Ratio | 9.74 | 12.73 |
| PEG Ratio | 16.43 | 2.55 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93.94B | $14.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.57B | $7.69B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.99B | $5.11B |
Correlation
The correlation between ADM and ED is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ADM vs. ED - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a -12.64% return, which is significantly lower than ED's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed ED with an annualized return of 6.35%, while ED has yielded a comparatively higher 8.87% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADM vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADM vs. ED - Dividend Comparison
ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than ED's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% | 1.75% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.52% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% | 3.82% | 4.45% |
Drawdowns
ADM vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and ED. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADM vs. ED - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is 5.40%, while Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that ADM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ADM vs. ED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities