ACSO.L vs. GDX

In the year-to-date period, ACSO.L achieves a -9.93% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 48.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ACSO.L has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of -2.01%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accesso Technology Group plc (ACSO.L) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACSO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSO.L and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ACSO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

The maximum ACSO.L drawdown since its inception was -97.41%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSO.L and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Accesso Technology Group plc (ACSO.L) is 7.88%, while VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that ACSO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.