ACB vs. PYPL
ACB (Aurora Cannabis Inc.) and PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. ACB operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ACB returned -22.84%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for PYPL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACB vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACB achieves a -18.96% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -26.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ACB has underperformed PYPL with an annualized return of -22.84%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.12% annualized return.
ACB
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.96%
- 6M
- -24.67%
- 1Y
- -36.31%
- 3Y*
- -12.77%
- 5Y*
- -48.19%
- 10Y*
- -22.84%
PYPL
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- -15.44%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 6M
- -30.21%
- 1Y
- -39.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.51%
- 5Y*
- -30.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.12%
ACB vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc. | -18.96% | -0.71% | -10.75% | -48.38% | -82.95% | -34.90% | -67.94% | -56.45% | -34.99% | 343.60% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -26.79% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACB and PYPL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2015 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ACB and PYPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACB:
$196.05M
PYPL:
$39.20B
ACB:
$0.72
PYPL:
$5.31
ACB:
4.74
PYPL:
8.03
ACB:
0.00
PYPL:
0.39
ACB:
0.53
PYPL:
1.20
ACB:
0.37
PYPL:
1.96
ACB:
$361.13M
PYPL:
$33.73B
ACB:
$226.51M
PYPL:
$15.56B
ACB:
$76.03M
PYPL:
$7.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACB vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
ACB
PYPL
ACB vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.80 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.45 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | -1.03 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | -0.73 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | 0.03 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.01 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
ACB vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than PYPL's maximum drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and PYPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -87.30% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.56% | -49.92% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.59% | -57.34% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.17% | -87.30% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.80% | -87.30% | -12.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.76% | -86.12% | -13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.62% | -35.63% | -34.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.87% | 27.53% | +4.34% |
Volatility
ACB vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 9.62%. This indicates that ACB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.29% | 9.62% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.82% | 31.64% | +10.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.89% | 39.02% | +30.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.77% | 42.08% | +47.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.78% | 38.76% | +59.02% |
Dividends
ACB vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
ACB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.66% | 0.24% |
Financials
ACB vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACB vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison
ACB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.62M and revenue of 94.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
ACB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported an operating income of 4.81M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
ACB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a net income of 1.82M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACB and PYPL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACB has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to PYPL (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACB dropped -99.80% vs PYPL's -87.30%.
ACB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACB and PYPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer