ACB vs. PYPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL).
Performance
ACB vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACB vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc. | -22.51% | -0.71% | -10.75% | -48.38% | -82.95% | -34.90% | -67.94% | -56.45% | -34.99% | 343.60% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -22.29% | -31.44% | 38.98% | -13.77% | -62.23% | -19.48% | 116.51% | 28.64% | 14.22% | 86.52% |
Fundamentals
ACB:
$187.45M
PYPL:
$42.47B
ACB:
$0.72
PYPL:
$5.42
ACB:
4.53
PYPL:
8.34
ACB:
0.00
PYPL:
0.40
ACB:
0.51
PYPL:
1.32
ACB:
0.35
PYPL:
2.10
ACB:
$361.13M
PYPL:
$33.17B
ACB:
$226.51M
PYPL:
$15.47B
ACB:
$76.03M
PYPL:
$7.18B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACB having a -22.51% return and PYPL slightly higher at -22.29%. Over the past 10 years, ACB has underperformed PYPL with an annualized return of -23.74%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.44% annualized return.
ACB
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -14.84%
- YTD
- -22.51%
- 6M
- -45.13%
- 1Y
- -25.51%
- 3Y*
- -22.31%
- 5Y*
- -48.63%
- 10Y*
- -23.74%
PYPL
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -22.29%
- 6M
- -32.19%
- 1Y
- -30.31%
- 3Y*
- -15.71%
- 5Y*
- -28.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACB vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
ACB
PYPL
ACB vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | -0.74 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | -0.82 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.88 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.61 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -1.37 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | -0.74 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | -0.69 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.24 | 0.04 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.03 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACB and PYPL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ACB vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
ACB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.62% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
ACB vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACB drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than PYPL's maximum drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACB and PYPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -87.30% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.56% | -49.92% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.17% | -87.30% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.80% | -87.30% | -12.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -85.26% | -14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.19% | -34.83% | -35.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.99% | 22.00% | +3.99% |
Volatility
ACB vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 9.59%. This indicates that ACB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACB | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 9.59% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.42% | 33.56% | +8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.90% | 41.33% | +28.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.13% | 42.00% | +48.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.95% | 38.63% | +59.32% |
Financials
ACB vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurora Cannabis Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACB vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison
ACB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.62M and revenue of 94.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.03B and revenue of 8.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
ACB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported an operating income of 4.81M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.51B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
ACB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a net income of 1.82M and revenue of 94.19M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 8.68B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.