AC.PA vs. RNO.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Accor S. A. (AC.PA) and Renault SA (RNO.PA).

Performance

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Accor S. A. (AC.PA) and Renault SA (RNO.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AC.PA Accor S. A.	-13.07%	5.35%	40.09%	53.08%	-17.93%	-3.89%	-29.10%	15.89%	-11.74%	24.48%
RNO.PA Renault SA	-15.19%	-21.06%	32.46%	18.91%	2.39%	-14.58%	-15.22%	-17.46%	-32.00%	3.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AC.PA achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly higher than RNO.PA's -15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AC.PA has outperformed RNO.PA with an annualized return of 3.27%, while RNO.PA has yielded a comparatively lower -7.42% annualized return.

AC.PA

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -6.60%
• YTD: -13.07%
• 6M: 4.02%
• 1Y: 2.38%
• 3Y*: 15.24%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 3.27%

RNO.PA

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: -15.19%
• 6M: -14.17%
• 1Y: -33.07%
• 3Y*: -4.28%
• 5Y*: -2.77%
• 10Y*: -7.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AC.PA

AC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 46
AC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
AC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
AC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RNO.PA

RNO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 13
RNO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
RNO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
RNO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 8
RNO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RNO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accor S. A. (AC.PA) and Renault SA (RNO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AC.PA	RNO.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	-0.96	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	-1.20	+1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.84	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	-0.64	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.39	-0.99	+2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the RNO.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AC.PA and RNO.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AC.PA	RNO.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08	-0.96	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	-0.08	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	-0.19	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.09	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AC.PA and RNO.PA is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Dividend Comparison

AC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than RNO.PA's 7.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AC.PA Accor S. A.	3.01%	2.61%	2.51%	3.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.51%	2.83%	2.44%	2.82%	2.37%
RNO.PA Renault SA	7.32%	6.21%	3.93%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.42%	6.51%	3.75%	2.84%	2.05%

Drawdowns

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AC.PA drawdown since its inception was -64.83%, smaller than the maximum RNO.PA drawdown of -87.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AC.PA and RNO.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AC.PA	RNO.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.83%	-87.97%	+23.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.65%	-44.85%	+24.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.74%	-46.93%	+6.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.12%	-83.55%	+27.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.79%	-62.71%	+46.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.94%	-33.16%	+11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.02%	29.00%	-18.98%

Volatility

AC.PA vs. RNO.PA - Volatility Comparison

Accor S. A. (AC.PA) has a higher volatility of 11.27% compared to Renault SA (RNO.PA) at 7.17%. This indicates that AC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNO.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AC.PA	RNO.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.27%	7.17%	+4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.39%	20.93%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.81%	34.27%	-3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.15%	36.33%	-7.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.47%	38.94%	-7.47%

Financials