ABNB vs. ^GSPC
ABNB (Airbnb, Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, ABNB returned -2.37%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ABNB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNB achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.79% return.
ABNB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 0.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
ABNB vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | -1.47% | 3.28% | -3.47% | 59.23% | -48.65% | 13.41% | 1.44% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.79% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNB and ^GSPC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ABNB and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNB vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
ABNB
^GSPC
ABNB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABNB | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.41 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.98 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 13.78 | -13.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABNB | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 2.28 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.74 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.47 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
ABNB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNB drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNB and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNB | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -56.78% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -9.10% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.16% | -18.90% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.19% | -25.43% | -34.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.33% | -0.33% | -38.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -10.72% | -25.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.01% | 1.97% | +8.04% |
Volatility
ABNB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.88%. This indicates that ABNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNB | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.85% | 2.88% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.51% | 9.00% | +13.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 11.89% | +17.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.77% | 16.90% | +26.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.02% | 18.06% | +27.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNB and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABNB has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to ^GSPC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNB dropped -61.96% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNB and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer