PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABCH.DE
21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP
-20.61%16.28%73.28%161.37%-77.13%-29.35%
CETH.DE
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-29.27%-21.13%53.89%91.46%-66.40%43.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCH.DE achieves a -20.61% return, which is significantly higher than CETH.DE's -29.27% return.


ABCH.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-20.61%
6M
-14.16%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
49.32%
5Y*
-4.85%
10Y*

CETH.DE

1D
-1.26%
1M
9.20%
YTD
-29.27%
6M
-48.68%
1Y
6.19%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCH.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CETH.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCH.DE
ABCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ABCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CETH.DE
CETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABCH.DECETH.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.09

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

0.62

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.04

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.64

0.08

+2.56

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCH.DE and CETH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABCH.DECETH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.09

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.07

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ABCH.DE and CETH.DE is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABCH.DE nor CETH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than CETH.DE's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCH.DE and CETH.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCH.DECETH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.87%

-76.74%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.22%

-60.73%

+29.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.17%

-56.78%

-13.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.96%

-42.51%

-30.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

29.09%

-15.31%

Volatility

ABCH.DE vs. CETH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) is 11.75%, while CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that ABCH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CETH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABCH.DECETH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.75%

17.47%

-5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.90%

45.39%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.52%

65.37%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.18%

68.38%

+17.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.85%

68.38%

+17.47%