AAPW vs. QYLE
Compare and contrast key facts about AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE).
AAPW and QYLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAPW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. QYLE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 ESG BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 21, 2023.
Performance
AAPW vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAPW vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | -10.43% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
AAPW
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 11.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAPW vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAPW vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank
AAPW
QYLE
AAPW vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | — | — |
Dividends
AAPW vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison
AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.11%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 37.11% | 28.83% |
QYLE Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAPW vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and QYLE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.28% | 0.00% | -36.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.79% | 0.00% | -13.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | 0.00% | -12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | — | — |
Volatility
AAPW vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAPW | QYLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.73% | 0.00% | +35.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 0.00% | +35.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 0.00% | +35.68% |