PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAETX vs. NDARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAETX vs. NDARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAETX) and American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAETX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than NDARX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AAETX has outperformed NDARX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while NDARX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.


AAETX

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.12%
YTD
5.73%
6M
6.48%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
9.03%

NDARX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.08%
YTD
6.67%
6M
7.74%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAETX vs. NDARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAETX
American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.73%15.41%10.50%14.08%-14.74%12.79%14.81%19.64%-4.56%18.11%
NDARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced
6.67%17.21%11.68%12.03%-10.98%15.09%7.10%17.88%-4.99%13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between AAETX and NDARX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between AAETX and NDARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAETX vs. NDARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAETX
AAETX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAETX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AAETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAETX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NDARX
NDARX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NDARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NDARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDARX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAETX vs. NDARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAETX) and American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAETXNDARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.44

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

3.44

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.72

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.21

12.30

-0.09

AAETX vs. NDARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAETX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the NDARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAETX and NDARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAETXNDARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.44

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.84

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.86

-0.34

Drawdowns

AAETX vs. NDARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAETX drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, which is greater than NDARX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAETX and NDARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAETXNDARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-23.62%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.12%

-6.86%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

-9.18%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-18.37%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.37%

-23.62%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.12%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-3.09%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.52%

-0.15%

Volatility

AAETX vs. NDARX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAETX) and American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced (NDARX) have volatilities of 2.22% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAETXNDARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

2.29%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

6.15%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

7.63%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.73%

9.49%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

10.21%

+0.45%

AAETX vs. NDARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAETX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than NDARX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAETX vs. NDARX - Dividend Comparison

AAETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than NDARX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAETX
American Funds 2030 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.99%6.33%3.73%2.69%4.39%6.47%3.57%3.95%4.46%2.46%3.46%5.52%
NDARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Enhanced
4.91%5.78%3.07%3.37%5.60%4.29%2.91%4.03%4.29%2.68%2.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, AAETX and NDARX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDARX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to AAETX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAETX dropped -49.49% vs NDARX's -23.62%.

NDARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAETX and NDARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer