PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AABTX vs. PRFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABTX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than PRFDX's 17.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AABTX has underperformed PRFDX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while PRFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


AABTX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.76%
YTD
4.44%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
6.37%
ALL TIME*
5.54%

PRFDX

1D
0.65%
1M
1.19%
6M
13.04%
YTD
17.26%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AABTX
American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.44%13.11%8.07%9.23%-10.56%9.95%9.63%14.47%-2.98%10.84%
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
17.26%14.60%11.85%9.75%-3.25%25.60%1.28%33.66%-9.29%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AABTX and PRFDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.87

The correlation between AABTX and PRFDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (3 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AABTX vs. PRFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AABTX
AABTX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFDX
PRFDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AABTXPRFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.58

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.75

13.67

-4.92

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PRFDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABTX and PRFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABTX drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum PRFDX drawdown of -58.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABTX and PRFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AABTXPRFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-58.12%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.74%

-7.34%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.38%

-14.35%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-18.08%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.58%

-39.71%

+23.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.44%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-6.24%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.94%

-0.84%

Volatility

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) is 1.26%, while T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that AABTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AABTXPRFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

2.99%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

8.32%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.36%

11.13%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.97%

14.84%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.24%

17.78%

-10.54%

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFDX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

AABTX vs. PRFDX - Dividend Comparison

AABTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than PRFDX's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AABTX
American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund
7.24%7.57%5.27%3.52%3.72%4.95%4.07%4.05%4.28%2.71%3.02%5.56%
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
2.25%2.76%8.91%6.19%6.61%8.78%3.55%12.53%11.43%8.97%7.75%7.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


AABTX and PRFDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFDX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to AABTX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABTX dropped -42.44% vs PRFDX's -58.12%.

PRFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AABTX and PRFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer