PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AABTX vs. MACPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AABTX vs. MACPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) and BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABTX achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than MACPX's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AABTX has underperformed MACPX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while MACPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


AABTX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.13%
YTD
4.20%
6M
4.90%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
6.58%

MACPX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.07%
YTD
8.90%
6M
10.15%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AABTX vs. MACPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AABTX
American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.20%13.11%8.07%9.23%-10.56%9.95%9.63%14.47%-2.98%10.84%
MACPX
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund
8.90%15.58%12.77%16.88%-15.50%16.76%15.37%21.86%-3.18%14.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AABTX and MACPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007

0.91

The correlation between AABTX and MACPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AABTX vs. MACPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AABTX
AABTX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MACPX
MACPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AABTX vs. MACPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) and BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AABTXMACPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.54

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

3.61

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.48

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.44

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.80

15.05

-3.24

AABTX vs. MACPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the MACPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABTX and MACPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AABTXMACPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.80

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.67

-0.13

Drawdowns

AABTX vs. MACPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABTX drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, roughly equal to the maximum MACPX drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABTX and MACPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AABTXMACPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-41.75%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.74%

-6.18%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-10.62%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-21.84%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.58%

-24.59%

+8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-5.35%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.41%

-0.33%

Volatility

AABTX vs. MACPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund (AABTX) is 1.68%, while BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund (MACPX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that AABTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MACPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AABTXMACPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.58%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

6.67%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.13%

8.26%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

11.09%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

11.47%

-4.20%

AABTX vs. MACPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than MACPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AABTX vs. MACPX - Dividend Comparison

AABTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, less than MACPX's 8.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AABTX
American Funds 2015 Target Date Retirement Fund
7.26%7.57%5.27%3.52%3.72%4.95%4.07%4.05%4.28%2.71%3.02%5.56%
MACPX
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced Fund
8.08%8.79%7.66%3.00%3.91%12.46%4.22%5.49%8.12%19.65%4.94%5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


AABTX and MACPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MACPX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to AABTX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABTX dropped -42.44% vs MACPX's -41.75%.

MACPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AABTX and MACPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer