5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) and Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE).

5HEE.DE and F4DE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 5HEE.DE is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018. F4DE.DE is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Ossiam Food for Biodiversity. It was launched on Dec 30, 2020. Both 5HEE.DE and F4DE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) and Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
5HEE.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)	-1.39%	-7.39%	10.30%	11.99%	-11.48%	31.39%
F4DE.DE Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR)	0.00%	-13.57%	9.90%	5.21%	-11.35%	18.46%

Returns By Period

5HEE.DE

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -6.15%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: -1.77%
• 3Y*: 1.56%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

F4DE.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5HEE.DE and F4DE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

5HEE.DE

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)

F4DE.DE

Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR)

Return for Risk

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEE.DE

5HEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
5HEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) and Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	5HEE.DE	F4DE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5HEE.DE	F4DE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between 5HEE.DE and F4DE.DE is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

5HEE.DE vs. F4DE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HEE.DE nor F4DE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	5HEE.DE	F4DE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.80%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	5HEE.DE	F4DE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.91%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	—	—