PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
-15.38%12.38%63.74%58.23%-41.50%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-19.09%13.90%60.92%187.21%-56.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SPY.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than 3QQQ.L's -19.09% return.


3SPY.L

1D
5.65%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-11.70%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
8.72%
1M
-10.76%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-16.94%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
38.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3SPY.L and 3QQQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

0.52

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

1.26

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

0.72

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.09

1.62

-0.54

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SPY.L and 3QQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.52

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.27

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between 3SPY.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3SPY.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SPY.L drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, roughly equal to the maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SPY.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-58.93%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.60%

-47.89%

+6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.78%

-42.24%

+5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-20.85%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.78%

21.13%

-2.35%

Volatility

3SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) is 12.87%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that 3SPY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.87%

16.78%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.20%

53.33%

-5.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.54%

70.29%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.52%

63.86%

-11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

63.86%

-11.34%