PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
-15.38%12.38%63.74%58.23%-41.50%
3ARE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR
-40.62%10.91%-29.08%193.21%-83.12%
Different Trading Currencies

3SPY.L is traded in USD, while 3ARE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3ARE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SPY.L achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly higher than 3ARE.L's -40.62% return.


3SPY.L

1D
5.65%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-11.70%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
10Y*

3ARE.L

1D
14.75%
1M
-20.53%
YTD
-40.62%
6M
-64.22%
1Y
43.69%
3Y*
-8.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3SPY.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than 3ARE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

3ARE.L
3ARE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SPY.L3ARE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

0.40

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

1.29

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.09

1.13

-0.04

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the 3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SPY.L and 3ARE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SPY.L3ARE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.40

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.49

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between 3SPY.L and 3ARE.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3SPY.L nor 3ARE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SPY.L drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum 3ARE.L drawdown of -99.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SPY.L and 3ARE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3SPY.L3ARE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-99.62%

+42.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.60%

-73.63%

+32.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.78%

-99.11%

+62.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-95.51%

+75.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.78%

34.64%

-15.86%

Volatility

3SPY.L vs. 3ARE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) is 12.87%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) has a volatility of 31.85%. This indicates that 3SPY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3ARE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3SPY.L3ARE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.87%

31.85%

-18.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.20%

75.95%

-27.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.54%

108.88%

-38.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.52%

134.15%

-81.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.52%

134.15%

-81.63%