PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-19.25%13.90%21.01%
AMZD.L
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP
-19.81%4.58%14.80%
Different Trading Currencies

3QQQ.L is traded in USD, while AMZD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AMZD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 3QQQ.L having a -19.25% return and AMZD.L slightly lower at -19.81%.


3QQQ.L

1D
8.51%
1M
-8.59%
YTD
-19.25%
6M
-19.07%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
10Y*

AMZD.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-19.81%
6M
-17.17%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZD.L
AMZD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3QQQ.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

-0.23

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

-0.12

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.98

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.01

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.65

-0.02

+2.68

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the AMZD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3QQQ.L and AMZD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3QQQ.LAMZD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.23

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.09

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and AMZD.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Dividend Comparison

3QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%.


Drawdowns

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, which is greater than AMZD.L's maximum drawdown of -27.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and AMZD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3QQQ.LAMZD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.93%

-29.73%

-29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-28.42%

-19.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.35%

-27.31%

-15.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-11.88%

-9.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.20%

11.85%

+9.35%

Volatility

3QQQ.L vs. AMZD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a higher volatility of 15.52% compared to IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) at 7.20%. This indicates that 3QQQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3QQQ.LAMZD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.52%

7.20%

+8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.30%

22.03%

+31.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.01%

29.42%

+40.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.82%

28.16%

+35.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.82%

28.16%

+35.66%